Coding Assistants

Tabnine vs Windsurf.

Both sit in Coding Assistants, scored on the same six pillars from the same published methodology. Here is where they actually differ.

The short answer

Windsurf scores higher — 81.6 against 77.0, a margin of 4.6 points. That is the overall answer, not the whole one: the pillar breakdown below is where the decision usually actually gets made.

Tabnine leads on security & compliance and maturity & reliability; Windsurf leads on momentum, capability and value for money.

Tabnine

Tabnine

77.0

Strong

Privacy-first AI coding assistant you can self-host.

From
Free / $9 per month (Dev)
Pricing
Freemium
Maturity
Established
Founded
2018
Windsurf

Cognition

81.6

Strong

Agentic IDE with Cascade flows, now part of the Devin family.

From
Free / $15 per month (Pro)
Pricing
Freemium
Maturity
Emerging
Founded
2021

Pillar by pillar

The same six pillars and fixed weights used for every tool on the site. A lead of fewer than 5 points is not called for either side — these are evidence-backed judgements, not measurements. Read the methodology.

Capability

Windsurf by 12

Tabnine74
Windsurf86

Value for Money

Windsurf by 7

Tabnine78
Windsurf85

Security & Compliance

Tabnine by 10

Tabnine88
Windsurf78

Integrations & Ecosystem

Level

Tabnine80
Windsurf79

Maturity & Reliability

Tabnine by 8

Tabnine80
Windsurf72

Momentum

Windsurf by 16

Tabnine66
Windsurf82

Which one, and when

Pick Tabnine if

  • compliance and data control decide it — it leads Security & Compliance by 10 points.
  • it has to hold up in production from day one — it leads Maturity & Reliability by 8 points.
  • Security-conscious enterprises
  • Regulated or air-gapped teams
  • Privacy-first code completion

The catch

  • Raw completion quality can trail the frontier-model assistants
  • Best value is the enterprise/self-host tier, not the free plan
Full Tabnine profile →

Pick Windsurf if

  • where the product will be in a year matters as much as today — it leads Momentum by 16 points.
  • the hardest end of the work is what you are buying for — it leads Capability by 12 points.
  • cost per unit of output is the binding constraint — it leads Value for Money by 7 points.
  • Developers wanting an affordable agentic IDE
  • Teams exploring autonomous agents
  • Cascade-style flow coding

The catch

  • Acquisition transition created roadmap uncertainty
  • Smaller community and ecosystem than Cursor or Copilot
Full Windsurf profile →

What each is good at

Tabnine

  • Strong privacy story: self-hosted and air-gapped options
  • Doesn't train shared models on your code
  • Broad IDE support and enterprise admin controls

Windsurf

  • Cascade agent keeps strong long-session codebase context
  • Aggressive pricing relative to capability
  • Backed by Cognition's autonomous-agent research

Other comparisons in Coding Assistants

Comparing something else? Build your own side-by-side across any tools in the catalog.