Sales & Revenue
Clay vs Gong.
Both are Sales & Revenue tools, scored on the same six pillars by the same published method. Here's where they part company.
The short answer
Clay scores higher — 87.6 against 85.6, a margin of 2.0 points. That is the overall answer, not the whole one: the pillar breakdown below is where the decision usually actually gets made.
Clay leads on momentum and value for money; Gong leads on maturity & reliability and security & compliance.
Clay Labs
87.6
Excellent
AI-orchestrated prospecting: enrich, research and personalize outbound at scale.
- From
- Free / $185 per month (Launch)
- Pricing
- Freemium
- Maturity
- Established
- Founded
- 2017
Gong.io
85.6
Excellent
Revenue intelligence: record every deal conversation and turn it into coaching and forecasts.
- From
- Custom (reported $1,400-$3,000/user/year plus a platform fee)
- Pricing
- Enterprise
- Maturity
- Mature
- Founded
- 2015
Pillar by pillar
The same six pillars and fixed weights used for every tool on the site. A lead of fewer than 5 points is not called for either side — these are evidence-backed judgements, not measurements. Read the methodology.
Capability
Level
Value for Money
Clay by 15
Security & Compliance
Gong by 7
Integrations & Ecosystem
Level
Maturity & Reliability
Gong by 8
Momentum
Clay by 16
Which one, and when
Pick Clay if
- →where the product will be in a year matters as much as today — it leads Momentum by 16 points.
- →cost per unit of output is the binding constraint — it leads Value for Money by 15 points.
- →RevOps and growth teams building targeted prospect lists
- →Personalized outbound at scale
- →Sales teams replacing a stack of point enrichment tools
The catch
- Steep learning curve: table-and-workflow model takes real ramp time versus a simple contact database
- Automated CRM sync and premium enrichment gated to the $495/mo Growth plan and above
Pick Gong if
- →it has to hold up in production from day one — it leads Maturity & Reliability by 8 points.
- →compliance and data control decide it — it leads Security & Compliance by 7 points.
- →Sales orgs standardizing call recording and coaching
- →RevOps building deal-risk and forecast visibility
- →Enablement teams replacing ad-hoc call review
The catch
- No public pricing; per-seat cost has risen 25-56% since the March 2025 unbundling into separate Forecast/Engage/Enable modules
- A separate, undisclosed platform fee (reported $5K-$50K/year) sits on top of per-seat pricing
What each is good at
Clay
- ✓Waterfalls across 75+ providers for up to 95% coverage on hard fields like verified email and phone
- ✓Custom AI research agents run per-record, not just static enrichment
- ✓Two-way native sync keeps Salesforce/HubSpot records current automatically
Gong
- ✓Deepest conversation-intelligence dataset in the category, built on a decade of recorded sales calls
- ✓Mission Andromeda extends it from analysis into live AI coaching, rep rehearsal and account management
- ✓Extensive certification set (SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001/27017/27018/27701/42001, HIPAA, PCI DSS) clears most enterprise security reviews
Other comparisons in Sales & Revenue
Comparing something else? Build your own side-by-side across any tools in the catalog.